Validation of a novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics: the SMARTBEATS study.

AIMS: In the current guidelines, smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) is not recommended for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), without a confirmatory electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Previous validation studies have been performed under supervision in healthcare settings, with limited generalizability of the results. We aim to investigate the diagnostic performance of a smartphone-PPG method in a real-world setting, with ambulatory unsupervised smartphone-PPG recordings, compared with simultaneous ECG recordings and including patients with atrial flutter (AFL). METHODS AND RESULTS: Unselected patients undergoing direct current cardioversion for treatment of AF or AFL were asked to perform 1-min heart rhythm recordings post-treatment, at least twice daily for 30 days at home, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running the CORAI Heart Monitor PPG application simultaneously with a single-lead ECG recording (KardiaMobile). Photoplethysmography and ECG recordings were read independently by two experienced readers. In total, 280 patients recorded 18 005 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings. Sufficient quality for diagnosis was seen in 96.9% (PPG) vs. 95.1% (ECG) of the recordings (P < 0.001). Manual reading of the PPG recordings, compared with manually interpreted ECG recordings, had a sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 97.7%, 99.4%, and 98.9% with AFL recordings included and 99.0%, 99.7%, and 99.5%, respectively, with AFL recordings excluded. CONCLUSION: A novel smartphone-PPG method can be used by patients unsupervised at home to achieve accurate heart rhythm diagnostics of AF and AFL with very high sensitivity and specificity. This smartphone-PPG device can be used as an independent heart rhythm diagnostic device following cardioversion, without the requirement of confirmation with ECG.

Peak frequency mapping of atypical atrial flutter.

INTRODUCTION: Peak frequency (PF) mapping is a novel method that may identify critical portions of myocardial substrate supporting reentry. The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate PF mapping combined with omnipolar voltage mapping in the identification of critical isthmuses of left atrial (LA) atypical flutters. METHODS AND RESULTS: LA omnipolar voltage and PF maps were generated in flutter using the Advisor HD-Grid catheter (Abbott) and EnSite Precision Mapping System (Abbott) in 12 patients. Normal voltage was defined as ≥0.5 mV, low-voltage as 0.1-0.5 mV, and scar as <0.1 mV. PF distributions were compared with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey analyses. The 1 cm radius from arrhythmia termination was compared to global myocardium with unpaired t-testing. The mean age was 65.8 ± 9.7 years and 50% of patients were female. Overall, 34 312 points were analyzed. Atypical flutters most frequently involved the mitral isthmus (58%) or anterior wall (25%). Mean PF varied significantly by myocardial voltage: normal (335.5 ± 115.0 Hz), low (274.6 ± 144.0 Hz), and scar (71.6 ± 140.5 Hz) (p < .0001 for all pairwise comparisons). All termination sites resided in low-voltage regions containing intermediate or high PF. Overall, mean voltage in the 1 cm radius from termination was significantly lower than the remaining myocardium (0.58 vs. 0.95 mV, p < .0001) and PF was significantly higher (326.4 vs. 245.1 Hz, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Low-voltage, high-PF areas may be critical targets during catheter ablation of atypical atrial flutter.

Sensitivity and specificity of handheld one lead ECG detecting atrial fibrillation in an outpatient clinic setting.

AIMS: To validate the sensitivity and specificity of the Zenicor One handheld ECG device for detection of atrial fibrillation in an outpatient clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients attending outpatient clinics at Danderyd Hospital (n = 220) were examined with one lead handheld ECG immediately after standard care 12­lead ECG recording. Twelve recordings were excluded (atrial flutter or pacing) or missing. The recordings were dichotomously categorized as "atrial fibrillation" or "not atrial fibrillation" by two senior cardiologists. In cases of diverging interpretations, a third senior cardiologist had the deciding vote. Sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing atrial fibrillation was calculated with 12­lead ECG as gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation with one lead handheld ECG and 12­lead ECG as gold standard was 98% and 99% respectively. CONCLUSION: In a health-care outpatient setting, Zenicor One handheld ECG had high sensitivity and specificity for detection of atrial fibrillation when compared with 12­lead ECG.

Incidence and patterns of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter-the FLUTFIB study.

AIMS: In patients with atrial flutter (AFL), ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is a highly effective procedure to prevent AFL recurrence, but atrial fibrillation (AF) may occur during follow-up. The presented FLUTFIB study was designed to identify the exact incidence, duration, timely occurrence, and associated symptoms of AF after CTI ablation using continuous cardiac monitoring via implantable loop recorders. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients with AFL without prior AF diagnosis were included after CTI ablation (mean age 69.7 ± 9.7 years, 18% female) and received an implantable loop recorder for AF detection. After a median follow-up of 24 months 77 patients (77%) were diagnosed with AF episodes. Median time to first AF occurrence was 180 (43-298) days. Episodes lasted longer than 1 h in most patients (45/77, 58%). Forty patients (52%) had AF-associated symptoms.Patients with and without AF development showed similar baseline characteristics and neither HATCH- nor CHA2DS2-VASc scores were predictive of future AF episodes. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) was stopped during FU in 32 patients (32%) and was re-initiated after AF detection in 15 patients (15%). No strokes or transient ischaemic attack episodes were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest investigation using implantable loop recorders (ILRs) to detect AF after AFL ablation and shows a high incidence of AF episodes, most of them being asymptomatic and lasting longer than 1 h. In anticipation of trials determining the duration of AF episodes that should trigger OAC initiation, these results will help to guide anticoagulation management after CTI ablation.

Posttransplant atrial fibrillation: Evidence of early posttransplant recipient-to-donor atrioatrial connections.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter originating from the donor s heart is a commonly reported complication post heart transplant. Atrial tachyarrhythmia originating from the recipient s heart, propagated through recipient-to-donor connections, is rare with only few cases reported in the literature; most reported cases from our review occur years post-transplant. CASE: A 47-year-old male presented with atrial tachycardia 6 months post heart transplant. Electrophysiologic study demonstrated atrial fibrillation originating from native heart and propagated through atrio-atrial connections to the donor heart. This arrhythmia was successfully terminated with radiofrequency ablation. CONCLUSION: Atrio-atrial connection between recipient and donor can form as early as a few months post heart transplant. Radiofrequency ablation appears to be an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation propagated through donor-to-recipient connections.

Cardiovascular Disease: Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults, with lifetime rates of 21% to 33%. There are numerous risk factors, including older age, hypertension, coronary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes, and others. Patients engaging in lifelong high-endurance exercise also have increased risk. Some organizations recommend screening; others do not. However, many patients identify AF themselves using mobile cardiac monitoring devices, some of which accurately detect the arrhythmia. Patients with AF with hemodynamic instability are treated with immediate synchronized cardioversion. Treatment options for stable patients include scheduled cardioversion, rhythm control with pharmacotherapy, catheter ablation, and rate control with pharmacotherapy. Catheter ablation is increasingly used as first-line therapy, with up to 80% of patients remaining AF-free after one or two ablation treatments, an outcome superior to that with pharmacotherapy. Patients with AF should receive anticoagulation based on the CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age 75 years or older [doubled], Diabetes, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism [doubled], Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74 years, Sex category) score, and also before and immediately after ablation or cardioversion. It is uncertain whether long-term anticoagulation is needed after successful ablation. Atrial flutter (AFL) is the second most common sustained supraventricular arrhythmia. Patients with AFL are at risk of developing AF, and many recommendations for managing AFL are similar to those for AF. The preferred management for AFL is catheter ablation, with success rates exceeding 90%.

Risk of atrial arrhythmias in patients with ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: In arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), risk of atrial arrhythmias (AAs) persists after ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the type, prevalence, outcome, and risk correlates of AA in ARVC in patients undergoing VT ablation. METHODS: Prospectively collected procedural and clinical data on ARVC patients undergoing VT ablation were analyzed. Risk score for typical atrial flutter was determined from univariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 119 consecutive patients with ARVC and VT ablation, 40 (34%) had AA: atrial fibrillation (AF) in 31, typical isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) in 27, and atrial tachycardia/atypical flutter (AT) in 10. Seventeen patients (43%) with AA experienced inappropriate defibrillator therapy, with 15 patients experiencing shocks. Ablation was performed for typical AFL in 21 (53%), AT in 5 (13%), and pulmonary vein isolation for AF in 4 (10%) patients and prevented AA in 78% and all AFL during additional mean follow-up of 65 months. Risk score for typical flutter included age >40 years (1 point), ≥moderate right ventricular dysfunction (2 points), ≥moderate tricuspid regurgitation (2 points), ≥moderate right atrial dilation (2 points), and right ventricular volume >250 cc (3points), with score >4 identifying 50% prevalence of typical flutter. CONCLUSION: AAs are common in patients with ARVC and VT, can result in inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, and typically are controlled with atrial ablation. A risk score can be used to identify patients at high risk for typical AFL who may be considered for isthmus ablation at the time of VT ablation.

Identification of 2 Distinct Boundaries Distinguishes Critical From Noncritical Isthmuses in Ablating Atypical Atrial Flutter.

BACKGROUND: Atypical atrial flutters often involve complex circuits. Classic methods of identifying ablation targets, including detailed electroanatomical mapping and entrainment within a well-defined isthmus, may not always be sufficient to allow the critical isthmus to be delineated and ablated, with flutter termination and prevention of reinduction. OBJECTIVES: This study sought a systematic method to classify conduction barriers and isthmuses as critical or noncritical that would improve understanding and ablation success. We also sought a construct unifying single- and dual-loop re-entry. Re-entrant circuits are bounded on 2 sides, although these are not consistently identified. We hypothesized 2 distinct critical boundaries, and a critical isthmus could be consistently defined without requiring entrainment, and ablation connecting these 2 boundaries would terminate tachycardia. METHODS: Activation maps were created electroanatomically. Conduction barriers were classified as noncritical barriers or critical boundaries. Critical boundaries showed sequential activation around the barrier, spanning ≥90% of the cycle length. Noncritical barriers showed nonsequential, parallel, or colliding activation or <90% of the cycle length. Only tissue separating the 2 critical boundaries defined a critical isthmus (CI); all others were considered noncritical. The effect of ablation across a CI was assessed. RESULTS: Complete maps were obtained in 128 cases in 121 patients (28 atypical right atrial, 100 left atrial). In all cases, 2 distinct critical boundaries were identified. Ablation across a CI connecting these critical boundaries terminated tachycardia in 123 of 128 cases (96.1%). Failures were due to inability to achieve block across the isthmus. CONCLUSIONS: Activation mapping of atypical atrial flutter allows consistent identification of 2 critical boundaries. Successful ablation connecting the 2 critical boundaries reliably results in termination of atypical atrial flutter.

Robust Framework for Medical Time Series Classification and Application to Real Scenarios in Modern Bioengineering.

In this study, a novel unsupervised classification framework for time series of medical nature is presented. This framework is based on the intersection of machine learning, Hilbert Spaces algebra, and signal theory. The methodology is illustrated through the resolution of three biomedical engineering problems: neuronal activity tracking, protein functional classification, and non-invasive diagnosis of atrial flutter (AFL). The results indicate that the proposed algorithms exhibit high proficiency in solving these tasks and demonstrate robustness in identifying damaged neuronal units while tracking healthy ones. Moreover, the application of the framework in protein functional classification provides a new perspective for the development of pharmaceutical products and personalised medicine. Additionally, the controlled environment of the framework in AFL simulation problem underscores the algorithm's ability to encode information efficiently. These results offer valuable insights into the potential of this framework and lay the groundwork for future studies.Clinical relevance- The framework proposed in this study has the potential to yield novel insights into the effects of newly implanted electrodes in the brain. Furthermore, the categorization of proteins by function could facilitate the development of personalised and efficient medicines, ultimately reducing both time and cost. The simulation of atrial flutter also demonstrates the framework's ability to encode information for arrhythmia diagnosis and treatment, which has the potential to lead to improved patient outcomes.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of atrial flutter in neonates.

BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter is an uncommon arrhythmia that can cause severe morbidity, including heart failure and even death in refractory cases. This study investigated the clinical characteristics, treatment, and long-term outcomes of patients with neonatal atrial flutter and its association with heart failure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed atrial flutter cases observed in our center between 1999 and 2021 and analyzed the clinical characteristics, treatment, and recurrence according to the presence of heart failure. RESULTS: The study comprised 15 patients with atrial flutter, with median bodyweight and gestational age of 2.7 kg, 37+4 weeks, respectively. Twelve patients were diagnosed with atrial flutter on the first day of life. The median atrial and ventricular rates were 440/min, 220/min, respectively. Four patients exhibited congestive heart failure. Episodic recurrence was noted in five patients and occurred at a higher rate in patients with congestive heart failure (p = 0.004). Antiarrhythmic drugs for maintenance treatment were administered more often in patients with heart failure (p = 0.011). Initial treatment included direct current cardioversion (n = 9), digoxin (n = 4), and observation (n = 2). Four patients treated with cardioversion experienced recurrence during the neonatal period, and none of those treated with digoxin experienced recurrence. The median follow-up duration was 7 years, during which no atrial flutter recurrence was evident. CONCLUSION: Neonates with congestive heart failure had a higher recurrence of atrial flutter. Direct current cardioversion is the most reliable treatment for neonatal atrial flutter, whereas digoxin may be a viable treatment option in refractory and recurrent cases.

Major in-hospital complications after catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: individual case analysis of 43 031 procedures.

AIMS: In-hospital complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be overestimated by analyses of administrative data. METHODS AND RESULTS: We determined the incidences of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, and stroke around AF, AFL, and VT ablations in four German tertiary centres between 2005 and 2020. All cases were coded by the G-DRG- and OPS-systems. Uniform code search terms were applied defining both the types of ablations for AF, AFL, and VT and the occurrence of major adverse events including femoral vascular complications, iatrogenic tamponade, stroke, and in-hospital death. Importantly, all complications were individually reviewed based on patient-level source records. Overall, 43 031 ablations were analysed (30 361 AF; 9364 AFL; 3306 VT). The number of ablations/year more than doubled from 2005 (n = 1569) to 2020 (n = 3317) with 3 times and 2.5 times more AF and VT ablations in 2020 (n = 2404 and n = 301, respectively) as compared to 2005 (n = 817 and n = 120, respectively), but a rather stable number of AFL ablations (n = 554 vs. n = 612). Major peri-procedural complications occurred in 594 (1.4%) patients. Complication rates were 1.1% (n = 325) for AF, 1.0% (n = 95) for AFL, and 5.3% (n = 175) for VT. With an increase in complex AF/VT procedures, the overall complication rate significantly increased (0.76% in 2005 vs. 1.81% in 2020; P = 0.004); but remained low over time. Following patient-adjudication, all in-hospital cardiac tamponades (0.7%) and strokes (0.2%) were related to ablation. Major femoral vascular complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 0.4% of all patients. The in-hospital mortality rate adjudicated to be ablation-related was lower than the coded mortality rate: AF: 0.03% vs. 0.04%; AFL: 0.04% vs. 0.14%; VT: 0.42% vs. 1.48%. CONCLUSION: Major adverse events are low and comparable after catheter ablation for AFL and AF (∼1.0%), whereas they are five times higher for VT ablations. In the presence of an increase in complex ablation procedures, a moderate but significant increase in overall complications from 2005-20 was observed. Individual case analysis demonstrated a lower than coded ablation-related in-hospital mortality. This highlights the importance of individual case adjudication when analysing administrative data.

Automatic segmentation of atrial fibrillation and flutter in single-lead electrocardiograms by self-supervised learning and Transformer architecture.

OBJECTIVES: Automatic detection of atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF/AFL) is a significant concern in preventing stroke and mitigating hemodynamic instability. Herein, we developed a Transformer-based deep learning model for AF/AFL segmentation in single-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) by self-supervised learning with masked signal modeling (MSM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved data from 11 open-source databases on PhysioNet; 7 of these databases included labeled ECGs, while the other 4 were without labels. Each database contained ECG recordings with durations of ≥30 s. A total of 24 intradialytic ECGs with paroxysmal AF/AFL during 4 h of hemodialysis sessions at Seoul National University Hospital were used for external validation. The model was pretrained by predicting masked areas of ECG signals and fine-tuned by predicting AF/AFL areas. Cross-database validation was used for evaluation, and the intersection over union (IOU) was used as a main performance metric in external database validation. RESULTS: In the 7 labeled databases, the areas marked as AF/AFL constituted 41.1% of the total ECG signals, ranging from 0.19% to 51.31%. In the evaluation per ECG segment, the model achieved IOU values of 0.9254 and 0.9477 for AF/AFL segmentation and other segmentation tasks, respectively. When applied to intradialytic ECGs with paroxysmal AF/AFL, the IOUs for the segmentation of AF/AFL and non-AF/AFL were 0.9896 and 0.9650, respectively. Model performance by different training procedure indicated that pretraining with MSM and the application of an appropriate masking ratio both contributed to the model performance. It also showed higher IOUs of AF/AFL labels than in previous studies when training and test databases were matched. CONCLUSION: The present model with self-supervised learning by MSM performs robustly in segmenting AF/AFL.

Corrected sinus node recovery time as a screening test in patients with typical atrial flutter post-ablation to predict pacemaker implantation.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish the prognostic value of CSNRT regarding the necessity for pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial flutter (AFL) post-ablation. METHODS: This prospective cohort study, conducted at the National Institute of Cardiology "Ignacio Chavez" in Mexico City, assessed patients who had undergone ablation procedures to correct AFL, posterior to which an autonomic blockade was performed, and CSNRT was measured. RESULTS: The sample for this investigation was 40 patients. These were subdivided into two study groups depending on their requirement of pacemaker implant post-ablation (Pacemaker P, No Pacemaker NP). Sinus node (SN) dysfunction was diagnosed in 13 (32.5%) of the 40 participants, 10 (71.43%) of which required a pacemaker implant, while only 4 participants (28.57%) with normal SN function required pacemakers. Ten out of the 14 patients (71.43%) who required a pacemaker had an elevated CSNRT > 500 ms (p ≤ 0.01). Post-ablation CSNRT mean was 383.54 ms ± 67.96 ms in the NP group versus 1972.57 ms ± 3423.56 ms in the P group. Furthermore, SN pause in the P group had a mean of 1.86 s ± 0.96 s versus the NP group with 1.196 s ± 0.52 s. CONCLUSION: CSNRT has the potential to be a quantitative prognostic tool for the assessment of future pacemaker implants in patients with AFL post-ablation. This could aid in the timely diagnosis of sinus node dysfunction, which could, in the long run, result in the reduction of cardiac functional capacity loss due to cardiac remodeling.

OBJETIVO: Establecer el valor pronóstico del TRNSC basado en la necesidad de marcapasos en pacientes diagnosticados con aleteo atrial, pos-ablación. MÉTODOS: Este cohorte prospectivo, realizado en el Instituto Nacional de Cardiología "Ignacio Chávez" en la Ciudad de México, evaluó pacientes sometidos a ablación para corregir el aleteo atrial; se midió el TRNSC post bloqueo autonómico. RESULTADOS: La muestra de 40 pacientes se subdividió en 2 grupos según su requerimiento de marcapasos posterior a la ablación (P y NP). Se diagnosticó disfunción del nodo sinusal en 13 participantes (32.5%), de los cuales 10 (71.43%) requirieron marcapasos en comparación a 4 (28.57%) con función normal. En el grupo P la pausa del nodo sinusal post-ablación tuvo una media de 1.86 ± 0.96 s versus el grupo NP con 1.196 ± 0.52 s. En relación con el TRNSC, el grupo NP tuvo una media de 383.54 ± 67.96 ms vs. 1972.57 ± 3423.56 ms en el grupo P. 10 pacientes (25%) obtuvieron un TRNSC > 500 ms, de los cuales 100% requirieron marcapasos; de los 14 pacientes que requirieron marcapasos 10 (71.43%) tenían un TRNSC elevado (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONES: El TRNSC tiene el potencial de ser una herramienta de pronóstico cuantitativo para la necesidad de futuros implantes de marcapasos en pacientes con disfunción del nodo sinusal, resultado de aleteo atrial pos-ablación. Esto podría ayudar a diagnosticar más temprano una disfunción del nodo sinusal, resultando en la reducción de la pérdida a largo plazo de la función cardíaca como efecto de la remodelación.

[Isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter : Clinical course after isthmus ablation]. / Rechtsatriales isthmusabhängiges Vorhofflattern : Klinischer Verlauf nach Isthmusablation.

Ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) to create bidirectional isthmus blockade is the most effective way to achieve rhythm control in typical atrial flutter. Compared with drug therapy, ablation reduces cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, stroke risk, and the risk of cardiac decompensation. Concomitant arrhythmia of atrial flutter is atrial fibrillation (AF); therefore the duration of oral anticoagulation should be adapted according to the risk of stroke and bleeding. A combined procedure of CTI ablation and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with typical atrial flutter but without evidence of AF should be evaluated individually especially in patients aged > 54 years depending on (cardiac) comorbidities. The comprehensive diagnostic view should keep in mind not only arrhythmias but also possibly underlying coronary artery disease.

Medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter with class IC antiarrhythmic drugs in young patients with and without congenital heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: The use of flecainide and propafenone for medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter/intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is well-described in adults without congenital heart disease (CHD). Data are sparse regarding their use for the same purpose in adults with CHD and in adolescent patients with anatomically normal hearts and we sought to describe the use of class IC drugs in this population and identify factors associated with decreased likelihood of success. METHODS: Single center retrospective cohort study of patients who received oral flecainide or propafenone for medical cardioversion of AF or IART from 2000 to 2022. The unit of analysis was each episode of AF/IART. We performed a time-to-sinus rhythm analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model clustering on the patient to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of success. RESULTS: We identified 45 episodes involving 41 patients. As only episodes of AF were successfully cardioverted with medical therapy, episodes of IART were excluded from our analyses. Use of flecainide was the only factor associated with increased likelihood of success. There was a statistically insignificant trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than propafenone. We did not detect a difference in rate of conversion to sinus rhythm between patients with and without CHD and were likely underpowered to do so, however, there was a trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. That said, medical therapy was effective in >50% of patients with CHD with AF.

The diagnostic and therapeutic challenge of atrial flutter in children: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Palpitations represent a common cause for consultation in the pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Unlike adults, palpitations in children are less frequently dependent from the heart, recognizing other causes. CASE PRESENTATION: A 11-year-old male came to our pediatric ED for epigastric pain, vomiting and palpitations. During the previous 6 month the patient was affected by SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus). Electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed supraventricular tachycardia. Therefore, adenosine was administered unsuccessfully. The administration of adenosine, however, allowed us to make diagnosis of atypical atrial flutter. Multiple attempts at both electrical cardioversion, transesophageal atrial overdrive, and drug monotherapy were unsuccessful in our patient. Consequently, a triple therapy with amiodarone, flecainide, and beta-blocker was gradually designed to control the arrhythmic pattern with the restoration of a left upper atrial rhythm. There was not any evidence of sinus rhythm in the patient clinical history. CONCLUSIONS: The present study underlines the rarity of this type of dysrhythmia in childhood and the difficulties in diagnosis and management, above all in a patient who has never showed sinus rhythm. Raising awareness of all available treatment options is essential for a better management of dysrhythmia in children.

Global Burden of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter by National Income: Results From the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Database.

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are common conditions that can lead to significant morbidity and death. We aimed to understand the distribution and disparities of the global burden of AF/AFL as well as the underlying risk factors. Methods and Results Data on the AF/AFL burden from the Global Burden of Disease data set were analyzed for the years 1990 to 2019, with countries grouped into low, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high national income classes according to World Bank categories. Data were supplemented with World Health Organization and World Bank information. The prevalence of AF/AFL has more than doubled (+120.7%) since 1990 in all income groups, though with a larger increment in middle-income countries (+146.6% in lower-middle- and +145.2% in upper-middle-income countries). In absolute numbers, 63.4% of AF/AFL cases originate from upper-middle-income countries, although the relative prevalence is highest in high-income countries. Prevalence of AF/AFL appears to be correlated with medical doctor rate and life expectancy. The most relevant AF/AFL risk factors are unevenly distributed among income classes, with elevated blood pressure as the only risk factor that becomes less common with increasing income. The development of these risk factors differed over time. Conclusions The global burden of AF/AFL is increasing in all income groups and is more pronounced in middle-income countries, with further growth to be expected. Underdiagnosis of AF/AFL in low- and middle-income countries may contribute to lower reported prevalence. The risk factor distribution varies between income groups.

Long-Term Impact of Additional Ablation After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Results From EARNEST-PVI Trial.

Background An optimal strategy for left atrial ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been determined. Methods and Results We conducted an extended follow-up of the multicenter randomized controlled EARNEST-PVI (Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) trial, which compared 12-month rhythm outcomes in patients with persistent AF between patients randomized to a PVI-alone strategy (n=248) or PVI-plus strategy (n=248; PVI followed by left atrial additional ablation, including linear ablation or ablation targeting areas with complex fractionated electrograms). The present study extended the follow-up period to 3 years after enrollment. Outcomes were compared not only between randomly allocated groups but also between on-treatment groups categorized by actually created ablation lesions. Recurrence rate of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was lower in the randomly allocated to PVI-plus group than the PVI-alone group (29.0% versus 37.5%, P=0.036). On-treatment analysis revealed that patients with PVI+linear ablation (n=205) demonstrated a lower AF/AT recurrence rate than those with PVI only (26.3% versus 37.8%, P=0.007). In contrast, patients with PVI+complex fractionated electrograms ablation (n=37) had an AF/AT recurrence rate comparable to that of patients with PVI only (40.5% versus 37.8%, P=0.76). At second ablation in 126 patients with AF/AT recurrence, ATs excluding common atrial flutter were more frequent in patients with PVI+linear ablation than in those with PVI only (32.6% versus 5.7%, P<0.0001). Conclusions Left atrial ablation in addition to PVI was efficacious during 3-year follow-up. Linear ablation was superior to other ablation strategies but may increase iatrogenic ATs. Registration URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm; Unique identifier: UMIN000019449.